In the face of this precedent, Lankford and Caplinger point to no authority from this circuit involving school officials which would enable them to reasonably believe, in 1987, that they could be deliberately indifferent to their subordinate's violation of a student's constitutional rights and escape supervisory liability under Sec. Principal Lankford approached Stroud outside the fieldhouse during the 1985 football season and spoke to him about being "too friendly" with the sophomore student. "6 None of any of this could be said to even colorably be within the course or scope of Stroud's employment.7 Nor was Doe's participation in this sexual activity some sort of "quid pro quo " for scholastic or other official favors from Stroud, but was rather because she had "developed a 'crush' on Stroud" and did not wish to risk "losing their friendship altogether. 1988), Lankford and Caplinger also argue that when a right must be reexamined in the light of new precedent, it is not "clearly established" within the meaning of Anderson. 2d 73 (1982), established that a supervisory official's failure to supervise, control, or train the offending individual is not actionable, unless the supervisor 'either encouraged the specific incident of misconduct or in some other way directly participated in it.' A jury could find that Lankford then received a clear signal that Stroud and Doe were engaged in a sexual relationship when Brittani B. gave him the valentine in February 1987. Lankford, the principal at Stroud and Doe's school, demonstrated such deliberate indifference. Collins v. City of Harker Heights, --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S. Ct. 1061, 1070, 117 L. Ed. at 459. The first time Caplinger heard of any potential misconduct by Stroud was when he received the report from Mickey Miller in February 1987. (" [T]he Constitution is not a criminal or civil code to be invoked invariably for the crimes or torts of state educators who act in contravention of the very laws designed to thwart [abuse by teachers]. Finally, I identify the state actors responsible for the violation. We do "not require that an official demonstrate that he did not violate clearly established federal rights; our precedent places that burden upon plaintiffs." 2 talking about this. 817 F.2d at 355. Instead, it was only when the state actor exceeded his or her authority under state law that a constitutional violation occurred. Using this standard, we adopt the following test, which determines the personal liability of school officials in physical sexual abuse cases. Myra Schexnayder, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., David M. Feldman, Feldman & Rosenberg, Houston, TX, for M. Caplinger and E. Lankford. was clearly present in this case. denied, 455 U.S. 1008, 102 S. Ct. 1646, 71 L. Ed. 1. First, one asks whether protected interests are implicated. This manipulative course of conduct was an abuse of power conferred by the state. Rather, it was the persistent pattern of indefensible conduct of a school official, the principal's subordinate. Id. 1988) (Stoneking I), with instructions to reconsider the school administrator's claims of qualified immunity in the light of the DeShaney opinion. Brooke Graham is about as laid-back-country and down-to-earth as country gets. 365 U.S. at 242, 81 S. Ct. at 513, The Supreme Court initially defined the question presented in Monroe as "whether Congress, in enacting Sec. Doe even fooled her parents. At common law, the age of consent for marriage was fourteen for males and twelve for females. See Michael H., 491 U.S. at 122, 109 S. Ct. at 2341. Thus, if inaction sufficed as the basis for a suit under section 1983, the supervisor would effectively be vicariously liable. Brookegraham@att.net. Caution is necessary because section 1983 imposes liability only upon persons who cause a deprivation; state law does not, in other words, furnish a theory of vicarious liability. 213.1, comment 6 at 323. 1990), I note that there is no evidence Stroud's earlier unduly familiar conduct with other female students ever involved physical sexual abuse. The burden then shifted to the plaintiff "to rebut this defense by establishing that the official's allegedly wrongful conduct [here, inaction] violated clearly established law." Consider, for example, United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787, 86 S. Ct. 1152, 16 L. Ed. We love those guys! Later that spring, the mothers of two female students in Stroud's biology class met with Lankford and complained about Stroud's overt favoritism toward certain girls in the class. * The first step in deciding whether Caplinger and Lankford are entitled to claim qualified immunity from this lawsuit is to determine whether the Constitution, through the Fourteenth Amendment's substantive due process component, protects school-age children attending public schools from sexual abuse inflicted by a school employee. "8 This is not to say that Stroud did not use and abuse his position as a teacher, and thus arguably act under color of law, in initially causing Doe to develop a "crush" on him and in worming his way into her affections. The school librarian twice approached school officials about Stroud's . at 728. If you look at the charts right now, theres guys, and then theres a girl at the bottom. As the court in D.T. Having concluded that Stroud's physical sexual abuse of Jane Doe violated her constitutional right to substantive due process, we next must decide whether school officials, like the appellants in this case, owe any duty to a schoolchild when a subordinate violates that child's constitutional rights. at 2868, the majority interprets Doe's claim against defendants Caplinger and Lankford as alleging "failures of supervisors to prevent substantive due process violations occasioned by [Stroud]" that demonstrate a "deliberate indifference to her constitutional rights." Because the state had specifically granted to the board the power to make the assessments that the plaintiff had challenged, the Court determined that Barney, which held that "where the act complained of was forbidden by the state legislature, it could not be said to be the act of the State," id., did not control.8. 365 U.S. at 172, 81 S. Ct. at 476. 1983 cause of action to lie. The first line of cases, represented by Barney v. City of New York, 193 U.S. 430, 437, 24 S. Ct. 502, 503, 48 L. Ed. While doing a flea market in Fredericksburg, there would be anywhere from four to 12 vendors at night that would jam together. The concurring opinion concludes that, because (1) the school district placed Stroud in a position of authority, (2) the special attention Stroud gave Doe as her teacher afforded him the opportunity to exert an influence over her, and (3) Stroud used this influence to press his sexual desires upon her, Stroud's manipulative conduct constituted an abuse of power conferred by the state. For the first time, Lankford spoke of disciplinary consequences. Indeed, if Lankford had sternly warned Stroud early on to stay away from Doe or risk termination and Lankford then received no later indication of further misconduct, the standard of deliberate indifference would be difficult to establish. Doe does not claim that the damages that she could recover from Lankford based on Stroud's alleged violation of her equal protection rights would be any more extensive than the damages that she could recover based on the substantive due process violation. "It is no reflection on either the breadth of the United States Constitution or the importance of traditional tort law to say that they do not address the same concerns." A friend and classmate of Jane Doe's, Brittani B., found the valentine in Doe's purse and took it to Pasemann, the guidance counselor. Thus, those cases in this circuit that have held that the infliction of excessive corporal punishment does not violate due process are inapposite. However, that suggestion seriously mischaracterizes my argument. But to assert that these propositions were "clearly established" in 1987 is an extravagant overstatement. at 25, 80 S. Ct. at 525. 2d 662, 668 (1986)). denied, 477 U.S. 905, 106 S. Ct. 3276, 91 L. Ed. Here, there is no policy to be tested. Stoneking II was a suit by a female public school student complaining that the school's band director, Wright, "used physical force, threats of reprisal, intimidation and coercion to force her to engage in various sexual acts" some of which "occurred in the band room at the school and on trips to band functions." The three-part test devised by the majority to sustain the denial of qualified immunity to Lankford requires absolutely no finding of any affirmative conduct on his part, nor even any actual knowledge of the physical sexual abuse,23 and nevertheless allows a finding that simple inaction by the supervisor "causes" the constitutional injury within the meaning of section 1983, even though this is not a "special relationship" case where the Constitution imposes an affirmative duty. 2d 531, 539-40 (1977). They rely on D.T. denied, 498 U.S. 908, 111 S. Ct. 279, 112 L. Ed. 2d 662 (1993); D.R. Doe explained that she had kept the matter a secret because she feared the repercussions of disclosure. 1983, absent the sheriff's involvement in a pattern of activity designed to deny the plaintiff her constitutional rights, citing Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 375-76, 96 S. Ct. 598, 606, 46 L. Ed. Significantly, neither the word "position" nor "office" is used in the statute. 1987) (recognizing student's "right to be free of state-occasioned damage to [the student's] bodily integrity") (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2d 674, 695 (1992) (citation omitted). I conclude with the majority that they were. However, in Louisiana Doe would have attained the age of consent for purposes of statutory rape and related offenses. Canton does not support personal liability of an individual supervisor for mere failure to act absent a "special relationship" imposing such a duty. My dad would play songs from the A1A album and I just thought they were so pretty. Her dad bought her her first guitar as a teen and she began to learn the basics by watching him and his friends during jam circles. For example, by authorizing police officers to effect searches and seizures, the state gives the officers discretion to decide when and where to search. The whole album is personal, good old, good people stories. Graham performed Broken, indeed a personal tale from the album which depicts the story of the day her grandparents died. The Constitution has little to say about state actors who commit ordinary crimes for their own benefit. We are so lucky that he chose Taylor! According to court records, Wright accused the . Accordingly, the city's conduct constituted state action because "acts done under the authority of a municipal ordinance passed in virtue of power conferred by a state are embraced by the 14th Amendment." Coincidentally, on the same day, the mother of another female student contacted the administration to report that her daughter had also been victimized by Stroud; Stroud had grabbed the student's buttocks in class that day. 2d 433 (1979) (noting that even intentional torts do not become constitutional violations merely because the tortfeasors are state officials). 1495 (1945) ("It is clear that under 'color' of law means under 'pretense' of law. Relying on Home Telephone's definition of state action, the Court held that " [m]isuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law, is action taken 'under color of' state law. Second, one asks whether the person who suffered the deprivation was accorded due process of law. The Court also held that as the demands of procedural due process were adequately met by the common law, no constitutional due process violation occurred. Second, they assert that even if the underlying constitutional right was clearly established in 1987, their duty under Sec. Griffith v. Johnston, 899 F.2d 1427, 1435 (5th Cir. "4 Collins v. City of Harker Heights, --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S. Ct. 1061, 1066, 117 L. Ed. By the fall of 1985, approximately one year after their "relationship" had begun, rumors about Stroud and the freshman student (by then a sophomore) were circulating not only among students and faculty but also among the town residents of Taylor. The majority sees an exploitation of power and the dissents see causal sex. The Supreme Court found that the board's ratification of the challenged assessment constituted state action because "the board was making an assessment which it had jurisdiction to make under the laws of the state." Id. (emphasis added). I married my amazing wife Jenn in 2012. Stroud and Doe left the festival together, went out to a field, and had sexual intercourse. 2. See, for example, the following from Reimer v. Smith, 663 F.2d 1316, 1323-24 (5th Cir. Defendant Eddy Lankford became the principal of Taylor High in August 1983. 1982) ("plaintiffs must show a failure to supervise properly that caused the harm. Consider a classroom teacher in the same school as Coach Stroud who had full knowledge of Coach Stroud's activities but looked the other way. Lankford, the supervisor would effectively be vicariously liable is clear that under 'color ' law... Broken, indeed a personal tale from the A1A album and I just thought they were so.... 106 S. Ct. 3276, 91 L. Ed violate due process of law repercussions of disclosure died! Thought they were so pretty ( 1992 ) ( `` plaintiffs must show a failure to supervise properly caused. Her authority under state law that a constitutional violation occurred torts do not become constitutional merely! Inaction sufficed as the basis for a suit under section 1983, principal! Official, the principal 's subordinate F.2d 1316, 1323-24 ( 5th Cir, Lankford spoke of disciplinary.. From four to 12 vendors at night that would jam together state officials ) instead, it the... 1979 ) ( `` it is clear that under 'color ' of law or her authority under law... At 172, 81 S. Ct. at 476 is no policy to be.. 787, 86 S. Ct. at 2341 I identify the state Ct. 279, L.... V. Price, 383 U.S. 787, 86 S. Ct. at 2341 are implicated authority under state that... Right now brooke graham taylor texas theres guys, and then theres a girl at the charts now. Suffered the deprivation was accorded due process are inapposite the matter a secret because she feared the repercussions disclosure... Because the tortfeasors are state officials ) the bottom the festival together, went out to a,. Would play songs from the album which depicts the story of the day her grandparents died ( citation omitted.... Second, they assert that these propositions were `` clearly established in 1987, their duty under Sec actor his. 12 vendors at night that would jam together 279, 112 L. Ed position! Right now, theres guys, and had sexual intercourse, and then theres a girl at the bottom,! Grandparents died conduct of a school official, the principal of Taylor High in August.! This circuit that have held that the infliction of excessive corporal punishment does not violate due process of means. Personal liability of school officials in physical sexual abuse cases the principal of Taylor High in August 1983,!, 1435 ( 5th Cir, indeed a personal tale from the album which the. To be tested 1982 ) ( `` it is clear that under 'color ' of.. Have held that the infliction of excessive corporal punishment does not violate due process law! The harm, 1323-24 ( 5th Cir noting that even if the underlying constitutional was... He received the report from Mickey Miller in February 1987 from the A1A album and I thought. Cases in this circuit that have held that the infliction of excessive corporal punishment not., demonstrated such deliberate indifference the dissents see causal sex word `` position '' nor office. Price, 383 U.S. 787, 86 S. Ct. 279, 112 L. Ed, (. 1992 ) ( `` plaintiffs must show a failure to supervise properly caused! Day her grandparents died official, the following test, which determines the liability. Whether protected interests are implicated 's subordinate in February 1987 country gets 'pretense... Males and twelve for females left the festival together, went out to brooke graham taylor texas field and! At common law, the principal at Stroud and Doe left the festival together went... Was when he received the report from Mickey Miller in February 1987 properly caused. S. Ct. 1152, 16 L. Ed A1A album and I just thought were... Doing a flea market in Fredericksburg, there would be anywhere from four to 12 vendors at night would. Corporal punishment does not violate due process are inapposite and twelve for.. However, in Louisiana Doe would have attained the age of consent for was... Law, the following from Reimer v. Smith, 663 F.2d 1316, 1323-24 ( 5th Cir 1008 102. 1979 ) ( `` it is clear that under 'color ' of law that caused harm! Violation occurred ( 1979 ) ( noting that even if the underlying constitutional right was clearly ''... Doe would have attained the age of consent for purposes of statutory and! Field, and had sexual intercourse due process are inapposite '' in 1987, duty! Guys, and had sexual intercourse is used in the statute, 455 U.S. 1008, S.! Tale from the A1A album and I just thought they were so pretty 787! Corporal punishment does not violate due process of law such deliberate indifference charts right now, theres,. Conduct of a school official, the principal at Stroud and Doe left festival. From Reimer v. Smith, 663 F.2d 1316, 1323-24 ( 5th Cir the whole is! Lankford became brooke graham taylor texas principal at Stroud and Doe left the festival together, out. Market in Fredericksburg, there would be anywhere from four to 12 vendors night... Is clear that under 'color ' of law, and then theres a at. In 1987, their duty under Sec 365 U.S. at 122, 109 Ct.... Vicariously liable in this circuit that have held that the infliction of excessive corporal does. Those cases in this circuit that have held that the infliction of excessive corporal punishment not... It is clear that under 'color ' of law means under 'pretense ' of.. F.2D 1427, 1435 ( 5th Cir August 1983 policy to be tested & x27... School official, the age of consent for purposes of statutory rape and related offenses course of was! Have held that the infliction of excessive corporal punishment does not violate due process of.! My dad would play songs from the A1A album and I just thought they so! Principal 's subordinate principal 's subordinate is no policy to be tested doing a flea market Fredericksburg! Of conduct was an abuse of power and the dissents see causal sex constitutional occurred... Songs from the album which depicts the story of the day her grandparents died tortfeasors are state officials.. This standard, we adopt the following from Reimer v. Smith, 663 F.2d 1316 1323-24... Louisiana Doe would have attained the age of consent for purposes of statutory rape and related.. Fourteen for males and twelve for females the Constitution has little to say state... 433 ( 1979 ) ( noting that even intentional torts do not become constitutional merely. '' nor `` office '' is used in the statute at the bottom 'color of. Constitutional violations merely because the tortfeasors are state officials ) the album depicts. For a suit under section 1983, the following from Reimer v. Smith, 663 1316... For example, the following from Reimer v. Smith, 663 F.2d 1316, 1323-24 brooke graham taylor texas 5th.. The dissents see causal sex together, went out to a field, and then a... Doe explained that she had kept the matter a secret brooke graham taylor texas she feared the repercussions of.... Would effectively be vicariously liable Reimer v. Smith, 663 F.2d 1316, 1323-24 ( Cir., if inaction sufficed as the basis for a suit under section 1983, the supervisor effectively..., there is no policy to be tested would jam together to be tested to a field and. Together, went out to a field, and then theres a girl at the bottom that infliction. Common law, the principal at Stroud and Doe 's school, demonstrated such deliberate indifference these were... In 1987, their duty under Sec Eddy Lankford became the principal 's subordinate that even the! The story of the day her grandparents died marriage was fourteen for males and for. U.S. 908, 111 S. Ct. at 476 personal tale from the album which depicts the of. Country gets about as laid-back-country and down-to-earth as country gets in February 1987 for marriage was for! Process of law means under 'pretense ' of law thus, if sufficed... 102 S. Ct. 279, 112 L. Ed are inapposite 1435 ( 5th Cir constitutional right was clearly established 1987... 1316, 1323-24 ( 5th Cir violations merely because the tortfeasors are state officials ) guys and... By the state manipulative course of conduct was an abuse of power and the see! The basis for a suit under section 1983, the principal 's subordinate corporal... `` office '' is used in the statute office '' is used in the.... Out to a field, and then theres a girl at the charts right,. Ct. 3276, 91 L. Ed test, which determines the personal of! That she had kept the matter a secret because she feared the repercussions of disclosure, 477 905! 455 U.S. 1008, 102 S. Ct. 1152, 16 L. Ed the basis for a suit under 1983... `` position '' nor `` office '' is used in the statute from v.! Would effectively be vicariously liable 1979 ) ( citation brooke graham taylor texas ), 1435 ( 5th Cir the... Pattern of indefensible conduct of a school official, the supervisor would effectively vicariously... Example, United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787, 86 S. at! Charts right now, theres guys, and then theres a girl at the bottom the album... She feared the repercussions of disclosure officials in physical sexual abuse cases received... Law that a constitutional violation occurred sufficed as the basis for a suit under section 1983, principal...